Just wanted to chime in on the whole Melo label thing…
I think terms have been overused and spread to thin when describing stars. Generational star has been stretched to cover the superstars of the generation, while the word superstar has been overused to just an basic star on any team.
Generation should be the type of talent that almost redefines a position, and the type of talent other teams must figure out a way to go through to win. I think there can be more than a few generational talents at a time, because I think it does come down to position. Bird/Magic and Jordan are the easy ones, but the Barkley/Ewing/Malones were just the “superstars”of their generation.
Young Shaq was generational, Kobe’s there, could even argue AI based on how impactful he was at his tiny size and, also bringing the flashier type ball handling in the league. Duncan was the most boring, but with his defensive instincts and impact on his team and games, he’s included. But Pierce/Vince/Tmac could only qualify for the superstar status of their generation.
Current ones are of course Lebron, Durant, and Curry. Luka basically is there, just a couple more years of consistency will solidify it. Jokic is reaching there as well because of the overall skill level at that size and pudginess. AD is one of those enigmas, where he has generational talent, but the injuries are gonna be what keeps him out.
The superstar title has lost its luster a little bit, but it should be reserved for those that you expect to make the all star team just about every year in their prime. Not the ones you hope might make it during a good year, but those that you know are always gonna be there. Tatum and Brown, Butler, Booker, KAT. Draymond I actually can’t include, I feel its more team success gets him there, but I would call him a regular star.
Melo will be in the discussion for all star every year of his prime. If you don’t want to call him a superstar yet until he proves it over the years, that’s fine, but we can say budding superstar instead. He does actually have the talent and drive to become a generational type player, but I think it goes more to the mentality - does he want to become a killer that carries teams home at the end of games and will make every game a challenge? If he’s averaging 26+ with 10 assists and 7-8 rebounds a game, he’ll definitely start creeping into the next level.
Either way, he’s the best player we hoped we could get the last 30 years, and could be another 30 til the next. I would not look to get rid of him for any reason, don’t care the teams current status. Giving him up early is such defeatist attitude that would actually maybe force me away from my Hornet fandom, which I wouldn’t think could happen based on my tortured dependent relationship with the locals.